In clinical trials

Immune & defense

Aviptadil

Also called VIP, RLF-100

EvidenceLow research
ClassVasoactive intestinal peptide

Aviptadil is a synthetic form of VIP studied for COVID-19 respiratory failure. See how it works, what trials found, and why it is not FDA-approved.

Reviewed by
William Maish, MD MBA MPH, Clinical Product Lead
Published
October 5, 2026
Last updated
October 5, 2026

Key takeaway

Aviptadil is a synthetic form of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), a signaling molecule that acts on lung receptors, and it has been studied mainly for severe COVID-19 respiratory failure. In the NIH-funded TESICO trial of 461 patients, aviptadil did not beat placebo on the 90-day recovery scale (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.55, p = 0.54). Ninety-day mortality was 38% with aviptadil versus 36% with placebo (p = 0.78), and the trial stopped early for futility. As of 2026 it is not FDA-approved for any use.

At a glance

What it isSynthetic version of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), also known by the development code RLF-100 and the name Zyesami
FDA statusInvestigational drug, not approved by the FDA for any use; studied mainly for severe respiratory failure in COVID-19
ResearchMixed human evidence: the largest independent randomized trial found no significant benefit and was halted early for futility
Outside the USA separate combination product containing aviptadil is approved in some other countries for erectile dysfunction, but not in the United States
Evidence strengthLow research

What is aviptadil?

Aviptadil is a synthetic copy of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), a 28-amino acid signaling molecule that occurs naturally in the human body. It has been developed and tested as a drug, most prominently as a candidate treatment for acute respiratory failure. It is also known by the research code RLF-100 and the trade name Zyesami.

VIP itself is concentrated in the lungs and the gut, where it acts as a messenger between nerves and tissue. Aviptadil is a manufactured version of that same molecule, intended to be given in larger amounts than the body makes on its own.

The history of aviptadil

Aviptadil's story runs from basic physiology to a high-profile pandemic trial. Vasoactive intestinal peptide was first isolated from the small intestine in 19701 by Said and Mutt, and Sami Said later focused on its protective role in the lungs. Because VIP is concentrated in lung tissue and helps regulate inflammation and blood flow there, it was proposed as a candidate for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a form of severe lung injury.

Interest surged during the COVID-19 pandemic. A synthetic VIP, aviptadil, was taken into clinical trials for critically ill COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure by the companies NRx Pharmaceuticals and Relief Therapeutics, under the names RLF-100 and Zyesami. The program drew wide attention when the companies reported encouraging early results in 2021. Independent testing2 followed, and it was found that it’s not effective, as described below.

How does aviptadil work?

Aviptadil works by mimicking vasoactive intestinal peptide, the natural signaling molecule the body uses to relax blood vessels and calm inflammation, particularly in the lungs. VIP binds to two receptors, VPAC1 and VPAC23, that are common on lung tissue, and activating them relaxes the smooth muscle in blood vessels and airways and triggers signals that lower inflammation.

Those receptors are not limited to the lungs. VPAC1 and VPAC2 sit on T cells and macrophages4, and VPAC1 receptors couple to adenylyl cyclase5, the enzyme that makes the signaling molecule cAMP.

A 2013 review of VIP's immune effects describes work in mice, where VIP:

  • Inhibited TNF, IL-6, and IL-126 and raised IL-10
  • Blocked NF-κB movement into the nucleus
  • Induced Foxp3-positive regulatory T cells through tolerogenic dendritic cells

These are animal findings, and they do not show the same effects in patients.

Much of the therapeutic rationale centers on a specific lung cell. In laboratory studies, VIP helps protect the alveolar type II cells that produce surfactant, the substance that keeps the tiny air sacs of the lungs open, and it reduces the release of inflammatory molecules. The theory tested in trials was that supplying extra VIP might help shield the lungs during the severe inflammation of ARDS. This describes the proposed mechanism and the underlying biology; whether aviptadil actually improves outcomes in patients is a separate question, addressed next.

Is it FDA-approved?

No. Aviptadil is not approved by the FDA for any use and remains an investigational drug in the United States. During the pandemic it was studied under FDA oversight and received expedited review designations, but the FDA declined7 to authorize it for emergency use in COVID-19, and it has not been approved since.

The FDA granted aviptadil Fast Track Designation8 for respiratory distress in COVID-19 in 2020, which speeds review but does not signal approval. Later, the agency declined the company's request9 for Breakthrough Therapy Designation in November 2021, according to the sponsor's quarterly filing.

One nuance is worth noting for accuracy. A separate combination product that pairs aviptadil with phentolamine, sold as Invicorp, is approved10 in some other countries, including in Europe, as an injection for erectile dysfunction. That is a different formulation and a different use, and it does not carry over to the United States, where aviptadil has no FDA approval for any indication.

What does the research show?

The strongest research shows that aviptadil has not been proven to work for the condition it was most studied in. It was tested primarily in critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The companies developing it reported favorable early findings from a company-sponsored phase 2b/3 study in 2021, but the pivotal independent test was the NIH-funded TESICO trial11, a randomized, placebo-controlled study of 461 patients. According to PubMed, that trial found that aviptadil did not significantly improve a patient's clinical status at 90 days, showed no reduction in mortality, and was stopped early for futility on the recommendation of its independent safety monitoring board.

TESICO's two headline results, up to day 90, were:

OutcomeAviptadil vs placeboSignificance
Better category on the primary 90-day recovery scaleOdds ratio 1.11 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.55)11p = 0.54
Death up to day 9038% of patients on aviptadil died11 versus 36% on placebo (hazard ratio 1.04)p = 0.78

In short, the human evidence is real but conflicting, and the best-designed independent study did not confirm a benefit. Outside the respiratory-failure setting, published human evidence is limited. Aviptadil is best understood as an investigational compound whose effectiveness for its studied uses has not been established.

More for immune & defense

Sources: trial results are from the NIH-funded TESICO randomized controlled trial (Brown et al., The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2023, DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00147-911), indexed on PubMed; regulatory status from FDA actions on the COVID-19 emergency-use request and from European regulatory records for the aviptadil-phentolamine combination. This document is educational research, not medical advice, a health claim, or an offer to sell; aviptadil is an investigational drug that is not approved by the FDA.